Loading…

Rose v. Clinton — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rose v. Clinton

1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2610 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 10, 1992

Full text

Stephen H. ROSE v. James J. CLINTON, III

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Johns v. Gillian, 134 Fla. 575, 184 So. 140 (1938); Stevens v. Crowder, 273 So.2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ferguson, Hubbart, Nesbitt
Cluster ID: 7664788

Citations

1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2610
595 So. 2d 256
1992 WL 43217

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service