Loading…

Zoghby v. Stanton — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Zoghby v. Stanton

1992 Ala. LEXIS 553 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 5, 1992

Full text

Emile Zoghby v. Victor Stanton.

Opinions in this case

Majority — Adams
Majority — Adams
Concurrence — Houston

AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION. HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX and INGRAM, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs specially.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Adams
Judges: Adams, Hornsby, Maddox, Ingram, Houston
Cluster ID: 7666766

Citations

1992 Ala. LEXIS 553
599 So. 2d 1150
1992 WL 120012

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service