Loading…

State v. M.O. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. M.O.

1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10438 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 9, 1992

Full text

STATE of Florida v. M.O., a Child

Opinions in this case

Majority
Concurrence — Dauksch
Dissent — Harris

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. GOSHORN, C.J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion. HARRIS, J., dissents with opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Dauksch, Goshorn, Harris
Cluster ID: 7668992

Citations

1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10438
605 So. 2d 600
1992 WL 266991

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service