Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Raypo Construction, Inc.

PER CURIAM. REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the guaranty provision of the retail installment contract was not ambiguous and that the trial court erred in permitting parol evidence to vary the terms of the guaranty. See Manufacturers’ Leasing, Ltd. v. Florida Dev. & Attractions, Inc., 330 So.2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.