Viart-Sotolongo v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Craycraft, 704 So.2d 593, 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that a warrant was not necessary for officers' second "entry" into a property where exigent circumstances made the officers' first entry lawful, the evidence seized during the second entry was observed during the first entry, and "[t]he second 'entry' was clearly part of one continuous episode.")