In the Interest of A.G. v. State

PER CURIAM. The respondent, A.G., appeals from his adjudication of delinquency for burglary and grand theft. The adjudication of delinquency for burglary is affirmed since the evidence established that A.G. actually participated. However, A.G.’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft must be reduced to petit theft since the State failed to offer evidence as to the value of the stolen property. See L.C. v. State, 579 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Affirmed in part; reversed in part.