Selmon v. State

PER CURIAM. The order denying Anthony Selmon’s motion for postconviction relief because of his failure to support the basis of his motion with sworn facts is affirmed without prejudice to Selmon’s right to seek such relief in full compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Affirmed. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.