Thom v. McAdam

PER CURIAM. We have for review McAdam v. Thom, 610 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite. The nonconflict issues will not be addressed at this time. It is so ordered. [185] BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.