Douglas v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s convictions and the order placing him on probation following his plea of nolo contendere. We strike that portion of the judgment which requires payments to the “Court Improvement Fund” and “Hillsborough County Drug Fund,” without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of these non-statutory costs after proper notice to appellant. See, e.g., Alfonso v. State, 595 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). FRANK, C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.