Loading…

Mitchell v. Kelly — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Mitchell v. Kelly

1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4123 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 3, 1994

Full text

Edward MITCHELL, Margaret Mitchell, and Mary Mitchell v. Robert KELLY and Roslyn Kelly

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Cope

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. BARKDULL and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Barkdull, Cope, Goderich
Cluster ID: 7744634

Citations

1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4123
639 So. 2d 66
1994 WL 162777

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service