Dilbert v. State

PER CURIAM. The denial of appellant’s motion for a “proposed order to clarify sentence” is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking relief with respect to gain time by filing either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. See Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hall v. [355] Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.