Beatty v. State

PER CURIAM. The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed. ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.