McDonald v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So.2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.