Aquino v. State

PER CURIAM. In this Anders appeal,1 we find on the face of the record that there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. In the context of the entire plea and sentencing hearing, it appears that the discrepancy is the result of a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order. Higginbotham v. State, 659 So.2d 461; Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, [425] 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989). In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed. AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. COBB, SHARP, W. and ANTOON, JJ., concur. Footnotes [1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).