Full text
Peter MARLOWE v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Haimovitz v. Robb, 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827 (1937) (“[H]e is not
[235] required under the law to do a vain and useless thing.”).

Loading…
Opinion
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 899 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 7, 1996
Full text
Peter MARLOWE v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife