Loading…

Madalone v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Madalone v. State

1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 24, 1996

Full text

William MADALONE v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Pariente

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., dissents with opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Glickstein, Pariente, Shahood
Cluster ID: 7760929

Citations

1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847
676 So. 2d 1066
1996 WL 411266

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service