B.L.J. v. State

1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 4, 1996

Full text

B.L.J., a child v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Majority
Concurrence — Lawrence

PER CURIAM. We reverse the judgment holding appellant in indirect criminal contempt of court because the order to show cause was not “based upon an affidavit or sworn testimony of an individual having personal knowledge of the essential facts.” Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We do not intend by this opinion to preclude the initi [531] ation of new proceedings, provided that the requirements of Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.150(b) are satisfied. REVERSED. MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. LAWRENCE, J., specially concurs with written opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Lawrence, Miner, Webster
Cluster ID: 7761507

Citations

1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9257
678 So. 2d 530
1996 WL 496305

Cited by

A. N. W. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 17, 2024
Senterfitt v. Oaks
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 17, 2001
Dixon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 4, 1996

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service