Zito v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as-oné of great public importance: IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) RETROACTIVE? AFFIRMED. DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.