Hazelwood v. Bautista

PER CURIAM. We reverse in part and remand for the trial court to enter an amended order limiting Appellant’s obligation for future medical and dental expenses by inserting appropriate words of limitation. E.g., Armstrong v. Armstrong, 623 So.2d 1216, 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. Canakaris v. Cana-karis, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.