Iengo v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Affirmed as modified. THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.