Full text
Benjamin Franklin HOLLIS v. The STATE of Florida
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174 (Fla.1993); Storey v. State, 153 Fla. 185, 13 So.2d 912 (1943).
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12450 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 27, 1996
Full text
Benjamin Franklin HOLLIS v. The STATE of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 13, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 13, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 21, 1997
Parentheticals
holding that the injured party is entitled to recover any and all damages flowing from the breach that were reasonably foreseeable by the breaching party
“Although the contract was silent as to the method of payment, the actions of the parties in making interim payments on the submission of invoices became a term of the contract.”
on rehearing, citing the long-established rule of Hadley v. Baxendale, 156 Eng. Rep. 145, 151 (Ex. 1854), that “[d]amages which flow naturally from the breach, and were foreseeable by the breaching party at the time the contract was entered, are recoverable.”