Canady v. State

PER CURIAM. Counsel for Taurus Canady filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sen [370] tence, but remand for entry of a proper written order. This court’s review of the record reflects that the trial court entered a defective sentencing order by failing to set forth the specific condition of community control that Ca-nady violated. Therefore, we remand the judgment and sentence with directions to the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Miles v. State, 590 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.