Pearson v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the revocation of Felipe James Pearson’s probation and the sentence imposed. We remand with directions to the trial court to enter a written order specifying that Pearson violated condition five of his probation. See Dietz v. State, 534 So.2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Pearson’s presence is not required. Affirmed but remanded for entry of written order. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and BLUE, JJ., concur.