Moore v. State

PER CURIAM. Because the uneontroverted evidence showed that the defendant did not have the ability to pay the court-ordered restitution, the trial court erred by finding that the [118] defendant had willfully violated his probation. Therefore, we reverse the order extending his probation. See Hewett v. State, 613 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1993); White v. State, 693 So.2d 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Laing v. State, 622 So.2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Reversed.