Hoagland v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), [137] and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part. BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.