J.H. v. State

PER CURIAM. Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and misdemeanor possession of cannabis. We affirm the conviction for possession of cannabis. We must, however, reverse the conviction for possession of cocaine because the State’s evidence was not inconsistent with Appellant’s reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e.g., Cook v. State, 571 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part. BOOTH, KAHN and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.