Opinion

Hugh v. State

2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 18, 2000

Full text

Eric HUGH v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Majority
Concurrence — Harris

PER CURIAM. Because we find that the issues relating to ineffective assistance of counsel should be raised post-judgment, we affirm the trial court on those issues. See Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1999); Woodbury v. State, 730 So.2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); and Section 924.051, Fla. Stat. (1999). AFFIRMED. ANTOON, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur. HARRIS, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.