State v. Shillingford

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the opinion in State v. Shillingford, 731 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in State v. Gitto, 731 So.2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.