Manning v. State

PER CURIAM. Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We find one to have merit. We reverse appellant’s habitual felony offender sentence based on Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Weaver v. State, 764 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In all other respects, we affirm. BARFIELD, C.J., and BOOTH, J., concur; WOLF, J., specially concurring with written opinion.