Williams v. State

2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13299 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 13, 2000

Full text

Stanley WILLIAMS v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority — Cobb

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Stanley Williams’ motion to correct sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the alleged sentencing error is not readily ascertainable from the face of the record. See Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla.1996). Our affirmance is without prejudice, thereby allowing Williams to file a legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion if he can do so in a timely manner. AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. HARRIS, PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Harris, Peterson, Sawaya
Cluster ID: 7795792

Citations

2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13299
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13300
770 So. 2d 713
769 So. 2d 479
2000 WL 1513754
2000 WL 1513729

Cited by

Gaynor v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 13, 2002

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service