Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson

PER CURIAM. The trial court’s order holding that it had personal jurisdiction over appellant is reversed. See, e.g., Baggett v. Walsh, 510 So.2d 1099, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (“unless a nonresident voluntarily appears and waives all jurisdictional objections, or facts establishing minimum contacts sufficient to support an independent basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the nonresident are shown to exist, jurisdiction obtained under [The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act] does not provide in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident parent in respect to matters of support”). JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.