State v. Spell

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of Spell v. State, 731 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on express and direct conflict with Fitzhugh v. State, 698 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., recused.