Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp.

PER CURIAM. Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.