Hilaire v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla.1987); Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (stating that “the legislature did not intend to require a finding that an operable handgun be involved in order to sustain a conviction of robbery with a firearm”), modified on other grounds, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla.1984). STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.