Loading…

Readon v. Kim — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Readon v. Kim

2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3511 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 21, 2001

Full text

Audrey Gillis READON v. Mirtha Lim KIM

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Perez-Borroto v. Brea, 544 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1989).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Gersten, Nesbitt, Schwartz
Cluster ID: 7798977

Citations

2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3511
779 So. 2d 669
2001 WL 273823

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service