Loading…

Cate v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cate v. State

2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15198 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 22, 2000

Full text

Joseph L. CATE v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Pearman v. State, 764 So.2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). DELL, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Dell, Polen, Stone
Cluster ID: 7801072

Citations

2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15198
788 So. 2d 290
2000 WL 1726932

Cited by

Robbie v. Robbie
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 6, 2000

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service