Mapp v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Thomas v. State, 748 So.2d 970 (Fla.1999)(standard of review is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, judge’s actions were coercive); Scoggins v. State, 726 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1999)(eourt’s knowledge of jury’s numerical division does not require reversal where totality of circumstances does not show a coercive influence).