Palilla v. State

PER CURIAM. Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated November 20, 2001, the show cause order is discharged, and the appeal shall proceed from the final order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, as the appellant’s claim is both successive and without merit, we affirm. See Hipps v. State, 790 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). AFFIRMED. DAVIS, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.