Bush v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we certify the following question: WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE? STONE, SHAHOOD, and MAY, JJ„ concur.