Hoffman v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, without prejudice as outlined in the trial court’s order. When addressing the merits, the trial court is to consider Martin v. State, 796 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), rev. denied, 816 So.2d 127 (Fla.2002) and Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla.1985). POLEN, C.J., SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.