Rodriguez v. State

PER CURIAM. As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s revocation of the appellant’s probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. [1052] 3d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Affirmed as modified.