Full text
Andrew REGISTER v. STATE of Florida
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of coram nobis filed pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d
[1161] 592 (Fla.1999). We conclude that, even if the motion were timely, it is barred by laches. See Barbz v. State, 740 So.2d 1243, 1244-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), rev. denied, 767 So.2d 453, 461 (Fla.2000).
WARNER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ„ concur.
