Loading…

Dardashti v. Bronstein — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Dardashti v. Bronstein

2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9645 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 10, 2002

Full text

David DARDASHTI v. Hillel BRONSTEIN

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sanar Clinical Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 766 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Gersten, Green, Sorondo
Cluster ID: 7811808

Citations

2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9645
824 So. 2d 934
2002 WL 1466223

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service