Louis v. State

PER CURIAM. Washington Louis seeks reversal of the trial court’s revocation of his probation, arguing that the evidence was insufficient and that the admission of hearsay testimony violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him. We affirm the revocation of Louis’ probation, but remand the case for entry of a written order of revocation. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 717 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.