Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 19, 2002

Full text

Amy GREENHILL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ayden Greenhill, for the use and benefit of the Estate of Ayden Greenhill, Amy Greenhill and Phillip Greenhill, as surviving parents of Ayden Greenhill v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL & CLINICS, INC., Florida Board of Regents Cardiovascular Perfusionists, Inc. and Rene Rivera-Santiago

PER CURIAM. The appellants challenge an order by which their medical malpractice action was dismissed, upon a finding that they failed to comply with a pretrial conference order. As indicated in cases such as Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990), dismissal is a severe sanction which should be used only in extreme circumstances. Tubero reiterated the description of such circumstances in Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983), referring to a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority, or bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference, or conduct which otherwise evinces deliberate callousness. Acknowledging the court’s discretion to sanction a party in these circumstances, Tubero requires that an order sanctioning a party by dismissal contain a finding which indicates that the party’s conduct was willful or deliberate. The appealed order in the present case does not contain such a finding, and in accordance with Tubero the order must be reversed. See, e.g., First Fairway Condominium I Ass’n v. Gulfstream Roofing, Inc., 701 So.2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded. ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.