Jones v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation based on appellant’s failure “to live and remain at liberty without violating any law,” as alleged in the violation affidavits. We direct, however, that the revocation orders be corrected to specifically reflect this violation for a new law offense, as found by the court during the violation hearing. See, e.g., Lee v. State, 826 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). AFFIRMED. BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.