Loading…

Muhammad v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Muhammad v. State

2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6260 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 5, 2004

Full text

Akeem MUHAMMAD v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Moore v. Burns, 796 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Gunther, Hazouri, Taylor
Cluster ID: 7824877

Citations

2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6260
872 So. 2d 411
2004 WL 950500

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service