Hicks v. State

PER CURIAM. The evidence did not establish that appellant was guilty of a willful and substantial violation of the terms of her probation. See Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Appellant’s sentence and the order revoking her probation are reversed and the case is remanded with directions that probation be reinstated. Reversed and remanded. BENTON, J., concurs, PADOVANO, J., concurs with opinion, and WEBSTER, J., dissents with opinion.