Opinion

Morrell v. National Health Investors, Inc.

2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7779 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 3, 2004

Full text

David E. MORRELL v. NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC., a Maryland corporation and American Medical Associates, Inc.

PER CURIAM. Appellees’ motion to dismiss, filed April 5, 2004, is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellate review is limited to the parties in the lower tribunal. See Penabad v. A.G. Gladstone Associates, Inc., 823 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). As David E. Morrell was not a party to the [581] proceedings below', he cannot participate in appellate review. DISMISSED. BOOTH,.POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Booth, Hawkes, Polston
Cluster ID: 7826015

Citations

2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7779
876 So. 2d 580
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1339

Cited by

Liliana Sanchez v. Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 18, 2025
Coleman v. Attorney General of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 12, 2013
Bondi v. Tucker
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 24, 2012
Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 8, 2012

Parentheticals

dismissing appeal as person filing appeal “was not a party to the proceedings below” and, therefore, “cannot participate in appellate review”
Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
dismissing the appeal because a non-party to the proceedings below may not participate in appellate review
Coleman v. Attorney General of Florida
“This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellate review is limited to the parties in the lower tribunal. As David E. Morrell was not a party to the proceedings below, he cannot participate in appellate review.” (citation omitted)
Bondi v. Tucker