Bentley v. State

PER CURIAM. Bentley appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion which sought additional jail credit. Bentley’s motion is facially insufficient because it does not explain why or how he is entitled to additional credit. Parent v. State, 825 So.2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We affirm without prejudice to file a facially sufficient motion. STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.